Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Rights of Various Participants in a Photo-shoot...

Part One: The Model´s Rights

_MG_0101_edited-1









Traditionally a photo-shoot involves two people: the model and the photographer.


 Other people are sometimes involved to complete various work necessary to making the shoot a success, the tendency being the more commercial the shoot, the more people involved.


Therefore what rights do these various people on a photo-shoot have, both during the actual shoot, and in the results of that particular shoot.

Also as many models, actors and photographers, makeup artists and really just about anyone, are often keen to get involved in many different roles within their industry, and therefore learn by actually doing, I offer the following summary of their ¨rights¨:

 

The Model/Actor


The model only has one right available to him/her to exercise; the right to the use of their ¨likeness¨.
They give the photographer permission to use their likeness for any lawful purpose, by merely standing in front of the camera, and allowing photographs to be taken, or by applying/attending to a photo call.

If it is a commercial shoot, or it is envisaged that the resulting pictures may be used for commercial purposes in the future, the model is asked to formalise this permission by signing a written ¨model release¨.

Shoots are often explained to a model verbally prior to a shoot, or at an audition, or in written form in a casting call. These conditions should be understood completely, considered carefully , and the requirements followed. Always ask if anything is in doubt or has not been explained adequately to your satisfaction.

Some shoot conditions often require nudity: and the model should always retain the right to the degree of nudity she is willing to allow.

It is always a good idea to state somewhere in writing, what you are prepared to do, and I (and most other professional photographers) have a question in my model information form which asks if a model is prepared to pose in swimwear, lingerie, topless or nude,
When these questions are asked, make sure that you answer definitely with ¨yes¨ or ¨no¨: if you wish to consider based on your future interaction with the photographer, state clearly that you will decide later, and make certain that you ask to amend the form at a later date.

If later, or  during a shoot a photographer tries to ¨convince¨ a model to go past what she has stated is her limit, he is actually violating your right to your likeness.

If however you take part in a shoot which has stipulated beforehand that a degree of nudity is required, you have no right to decline when it is asked for.

Technically also, and this applies to most professional photographers, and most shoots, models do not have  the right to review, or veto the use of any of the shots taken during the shoot.
Most photographers will allow or license a selection of the shots to the model for use in his/her portfolio, and for self promotion, although technically this is not required.
If the photographer is shooting for a specific client, that client may not allow the model any photographs at all.

Disturbingly to both professional photographers and models two trends have emerged recently:

  • Photographers, mainly amateurs, but also those who should know better, have been offering, or promising ¨rights¨ to models that they are not in a position to offer, and that models are not entitled to. This is almost always under the guise of ¨considering the model´s welfare¨, but in reality is confusing to new models, as they go on to demand these ¨rights¨ when dealing with professionals, and as a result are quickly shown the door.

  • Some models have landed themselves in very expensive trouble by selling prints of themselves which are copyright to others, or leasing their photographs to magazines, and thus breaching the copyright (and damaging the potential income, livelihood, and reputation) of the photographer who generally owns the copyright to all the photos taken during a shoot...one well known stable of magazines actually encourages this practice thus adding confusion to what is a clear cut case of copyright ownership.

Models do not own any copyright in photographs they appear in: and although there has been a great deal of waffle (especially on internet forums) about joint copyright, a professional photographer would rarely if ever consider such a logistical nightmare.

©Copyright: Stephen Bennett, MMXIV

Remember, that all photographs accompanying this blog are Copyright (All Rights Reserved) and may not be used for any purpose whatsoever without written permission from the photographer.


Interesting Links:
My Photography Webpage
Facebook page for Professional Photographers and Models
The Definite Article Photography and Video on Facebook
My Pond 5 Page
The Definite Article at Publicise Me

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

In praise of models


Models, Remember them?

They are the attractive thing which keep your photographs from being a picture of a blank white wall. (Oh no! I think I just spawned a rash of theme shoots!)

So why should I thank them: haven’t I already provided them with pictures for their portfolios? Haven’t I given them “exposure” for their career? Maybe I have even given them a few dollars in payment…so surely none of them need to be thanked again, let alone praised?
bronwen
The girl who started it all, so many years ago

Being a good model has little to do with how pretty a girl is, how skilful she is at presenting and posing her body, how "cooperative" or  “malleable” she may be, or how many layers of clothing she is willing to remove to further a photographer's “art”.

There is much more to being a model than standing in front of a camera: anybody can do that. But it takes skill and ability to project a thought, an emotion, a concept or a personality down the barrel of a lens.

Modelling is hard work.

I have recently had the pleasure of working with three excellent models who not only know the difficulties of modelling and the hard work involved , but have lifted their modelling to an art form.:

Abbey Lee ,http://www.starnow.com.au/abbeycallton

Cassie Franklin, https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008289011467&fref=tl_fr_box

and Rinny, who unfortunately (for photographers that is) has left modelling now to further her outstanding creativity behind the camera.

I have been photographing models for over thirty five years, and yet I will be approaching my upcoming shoots with Kerrie and Shannon-lee next week with the same anticipation, enthusiasm,  and trepidation as that first shoot so many years ago.

Experience has taught me that both these girls will be excellent, and will provide many wonderful and useful photographs.

It just pays to remember models are people too: they come from all walks of life. Some just model for the fun of it, some do it occasionally and casually, others do it only for certain photographers, and a few, a very few, take it to much greater heights than any of us could imagine, making it in a very competitive field, or as a lucrative career.

Collaboration is a much hackneyed and abused word, especially in the world of internet modelling, but models are the substance which makes or breaks your photographic results.  All the girls I have ever worked with, have been collaborators in the true sense, stamping their beauty and personalities on each and every photograph we have made together.

There are far too many to list here, but some of the memorable, and outstanding models I have worked with include:
Audrey Currie, Cathy Taylor, Donna Lynne Ralph, Elke Joris, Emma-lea Lawrence, Jackie Kirby, Jeanne Foxx, Jenny Mapperson, Joanne Dailly, Julie Govenlock, Karen Hoy, Karen Salaris, Kerry Ann Halvorson, Kim Verity, Kristine and Roslyn Brunt, Lisa Wells, Monika Gorecki, Narelle Rice, Patricia Rosario, Robyn Drew, Tonette Kelly, and Tracey Palmer, Adele Wilson,…and many more…

I have lost touch with many of these girls over the years, but if any happen to be reading this, I would love for you to get in touch.

And last but certainly not least I owe a great deal to Bronwen Creevey (nee Jarrett), the very first model I ever photographed, who not only went on to a great modelling career, but whose wonderful poise, charm, beauty and ability before the camera, and her terrific personality, convinced me that model photography was a pretty good way to make a living.

Remember, that all photographs accompanying this blog are Copyright (All Rights Reserved) and may not be used for any purpose whatsoever without written permission from the photographer.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/645731338825617/
https://www.facebook.com/thedefinitearticlephotography
http://publicize.me/definitearts
https://www.pond5.com/artist/definitearts

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Time to do some thinking...

Spare a little time for some thought...

With the new financial year looming, and Crooning Joe´s extreme austerity budget delivered, and its real terror beginning to become apparent, I have been reviewing my fees and prices structure for the next year or so.

It has also proven a great opportunity to check out the ¨opposition¨ as their websites, or more accurately their Facebook ¨Business¨ pages are totally unavoidable.

These newly set up FauxPro businesses all seem to have the same things in common, including almost identical photographs, mainly consisting of low/no budget weddings, pregnant bellies, babies, kids, and family goups; graceless girls awkwardly posed, while dreams of making it as a supermodel dance behind meaningless stares; miles of oversaturated landscapes and sunsets, and subjectless panographs ..

Apart from lowering the value of photography for everyone, and acclimatising the general public to the belief that ¨Professional¨ photography is nothing but artless snapshots, are these newcomers really ¨competition¨ in any way, shape or form?

Navigating Facebook pages are a challenge at the best of times, and It is quite a feat to first of all wade through the plethora of self designed ¨Discount Vouchers¨, but eventually you can find what they actually seem to charge.

Judging from these published rates and fees, viewed beside the photographic examples, the majority seem to be squarely targetting the lowest rung of the market, that is the people who do not own a smartphone and are therefore unable to better the efforts of these ¨professionals¨ by taking a selfie.

After due consideration and evaluation of their business practices I am sure, (???) the magic and mystical number they arrive at ...almost universally without exception...seems to be $50 for a three hour session.

Extrapolating from this figure, and assuming that:
  • the long accepted professional practice that for each hour of shooting an equal time is spent on pre and postproduction work,
  • and allowing for the maximum number of shoots that can be physically fitted within the limited time of one week;
it works out they they will be able to gross (Gross, without any of the overheads and maintainance of running a photography business)

LESS that the current Newstart Allowance or similar govt. provided dole options....(Current not future)

Well, the artist starving in their garrett is an important part of the mythology after all!

¨But I´ll easily make it up with print sales¨ ... Can´t you just hear all those sheep bleating.


  • Given the ever declining lack of interest in prints since the digital era began,
  • the infinitismal markup which can be added to even the lowest quality printing costs to maintain any sales at all,
  • and the fact  that they give away any number between five and twenty full resolution digital files with every sales package they offer.

Yes I repeat Give away: so whether restricted by a usage license or not, customers are free to print off as many copies of each pic as they want. 

These free digital files in hand , a quick trip to the local variety store photo booth will get them 10 x 8´s at the phenomenal price of : ...wait for it....$2.50 each.

Doh!


So not only are these FauxPros devaluing the work of all photographers in general, they place absolutely no value whatsoever on their own work.

Which in many cases seems quite appropriate.

However amongst the mileu there is an occassional tyro and all too often misguided photographer who shows enough talent and determination to place them above all those others who think that calling themselves a ¨Professional Photographer ¨would be a lot more ¨fun¨ than getting themselves a ¨real job¨.

To those occassional few the best advice would be to forget photography for at least three months:
- do even the most basic of business courses,
- research, and evaluate your skills, interests and strengths
- learn how to market those attributes effectively to the right audience,
- actively pursue a photographic niche
- formulate a business plan which would ensure that your business was actually able to maintain itself (and you) as a business...
- make an actual effort at improving yourself and your photography,


and then instead of aspiring to the already bulging ranks of the FauxPro

... I am sure you would be welcomed into the fold of Professional Photographer



Remember, that all photographs accompanying this blog are Copyright (All Rights Reserved) and may not be used for any purpose whatsoever without written permission from the photographer.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/645731338825617/
https://www.facebook.com/thedefinitearticlephotography
http://publicize.me/definitearts
https://www.pond5.com/artist/definitearts

Tuesday, June 3, 2014

MODELS BEWARE!


If you can stop laughing that is...













  An experienced model can work confidently with any photographer, secure in her knowledge of the model release

Remember, that all photographs accompanying this blog are Copyright (All Rights Reserved) and may not be used for any purpose whatsoever without written permission from the photographer. 

Was shown a  ¨Model  Release¨ yesterday presented to a model acquaintance for signing by a ¨photographer¨ I didn´t know very much about.

Being experienced the model took one look, laughed and walked away from the shoot, but the document is indicative of much of the nonsensical paperwork floating around shoots in recent years.

Obviously cobbled together from ¨stuff¨¨garnered from interent forums and their resident experts, knowledgeable mates , and a bit of home spun ¨fairness¨  thrown in for good measure, the release consisted of  4 to 5 pages ( yes! really!) of psuedo legalistic terms and phrases , paragraphs compeletely contradicting the one before it, and  a liberal sprinkling of demands, obligations and ¨rights¨ for everyone involved.

I stopped reading when I reached a large section ( almost a full page) devoted entirely to the make up artist (?)...therefore I don´t know whether the studio cleaner, or the tea lady featured in the remaining two and half pages.

Part release, part contract, part ¨agreement to shoot¨ ( who uses those anymore? ), part control-freak egotism, and part utter nonsense, the whole document became all of them and none of them simultaneously, couched in meaningless gobbledegook.

However after interpreting the confusing and almost illiterate language of the very first statement, the penny dropped:

Basically it translated as  ¨This Release covers photographs taken for NON COMMERCIAL purposes ONLY¨

Are releases like these the result of complete ignorance, plain stupidity, or the overwhelming desire of people masquerading as photographers to appear as if they know what they are doing?

As the sole reason behind needing a ¨Model release¨ is to permit images to be used for Commercial purposes, why even attempt to bamboozle models, especially those with little or no experience, with such time wasting, energy sapping and delusional rubbish?

But then again it could be just an aversion to proper research by the photogapher into the accepted workings of his chosen profession.

In that case just how much does this aversion to knowledge about the necessary paperwork vital to their profession correlate with their knowledge and skill, in relation to techniques, creativity and marketting of their actual photography?

So Models, please dont encourage them.

Instead, check out what a  standard, and acceptable model release looks like, and what it needs to contain, and when and why it is necessry to sign one.

And if the one you are presented by certain photographers, varies too much from the norm, have an experienced  professional photographer check it out for you.

There is probably no need to go to the expense of a solicitor looking it over, because the concept of a model release is so simple that legal advice should not be necessary.


Then you too can confidently enjoy the thrill of laughing and walking away, when you need to.




https://www.facebook.com/groups/645731338825617/
https://www.facebook.com/thedefinitearticlephotography
http://publicize.me/definitearts
https://www.pond5.com/artist/definitearts